Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JANUARY 2018

Is eRecording Secure? Recognizing The Risks, Deflating The Myths

When it comes to the electronic recording and notarization of documents, Kentucky has historically been on the outside looking in, while neighboring states have embraced the efficiency and cost-saving benefits of eRecording.

United StatesStrategy

When it comes to the electronic recording and notarization of documents, Kentucky has historically been on the outside looking in, while neighboring states have embraced the efficiency and cost-saving benefits of eRecording. But that may soon change: Kentucky is on the verge of passing legislation that would adopt the key provisions of the Uniform Real Property Electronic Recording Act (URPERA) and Revised Uniform Law on Notarial Act (RULONA). If the bill passes in 2018, Kentucky will allow eRecording for real estate documents (currently prohibited under Kentucky's non-uniform UETA, KRS 369.103(2)(c)) and eNotarization). While Kentucky has gradually warmed to the idea of eRecording, some remain skeptical of the e-trend, fearing it may expose consumers to new security risks and hazards.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from