Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 OCTOBER 2026

Vargas Update: Nonjudicial Foreclosures In Limbo

The Washington Supreme Court's April ruling in Vargas v. RRA CP Opportunity Trust 1 prohibited nonjudicial foreclosure on Home Equity Lines of Credit (HELOCs), but after granting reconsideration and withdrawing its original opinion, the legal landscape remains uncertain. Lenders now face ambiguity about which instruments qualify for nonjudicial foreclosure under the Deed of Trust Act, creating widespread confusion about enforcement mechanisms. What does this mean for creditors attempting to collect on HELOC

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

On April 30th, the Washington Supreme Court ruled in Vargas v. RRA CP Opportunity Trust 1, et al. that beneficiaries seeking to enforce collection on a Home Equity Line of Credit (“HELOC”) cannot do so by way of the Deed of Trust Act (RCW 61.24 et. seq). In other words, creditors trying to collect on a HELOC debt could no longer avail themselves to nonjudicial foreclosure. I previously wrote an article regarding the impact of Vargas here.

On May 20th, the lender, filed a motion for reconsideration to the Supreme Court arguing, among other things, that the opinion: (1) incorrectly read a requirement that instruments be negotiable into RCW 61.24 et. seq; (2) that the modification to the statute in RCW 61.24.030(7) did not require that the beneficiary be a “holder”, but rather, simply intended to permit servicers and agents to pursue foreclosure; and (3) that foreclosure on guaranties, which are not negotiable instruments, is expressly permitted under RCW 61.24.100(6), a fact that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from