We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.
ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2015
Undisclosed Change In Building Height Requires Supplemental EIR

Sheppard
Contributor

Sheppard
Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...
View firm profileThe Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District of California has ruled that (i) a 20% increase in the actual height of a building over the stated height in the certified EIR required Ventura County to prepare a supplemental EIR rather than an addendum; and (ii) the County’s failure to prepare a supplemental EIR including the taller height of the building made the County susceptible to a valid claim beyond the standard 30-day statute of limitations on CEQA claims.
United StatesReal Estate and Construction






