Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 DECEMBER 2014

SJC Holds That Springfield Foreclosure Ordinances Are Invalid

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ("SJC") recently issued another decision affecting the foreclosure of mortgages in Massachusetts

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ("SJC") recently issued another decision affecting the foreclosure of mortgages in Massachusetts. In Easthampton Savings Bank v. City of Springfield, No. 11612, slip op. (Mass. Dec. 19, 2014), the SJC struck down two mortgage ordinances adopted by the City of Springfield ("City") in 2011, holding that both ordinances are preempted by existing state laws.

The ordinances deal with the foreclosure process and were adopted in response to a wave of foreclosures triggered by the economic downturn of 2008. One ordinance establishes a program requiring mandatory mediation between borrowers and lenders of residential properties. The other ordinance requires owners of residential buildings that are vacant or undergoing foreclosure to register with the City and specifies minimum maintenance requirements. The SJC held that both ordinances conflict with and are preempted by state law. The SJC also held that a monetary charge imposed on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from