Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 NOVEMBER 2013

Restrictive Zoning Ordinances Questioned

Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Fox Rothschild LLP

In Keener v. Rapho Tp. Zoning Hearing Bd., No. 2306 C.D. 2012, July 31, 2013, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held that Rapho Township's Zoning Ordinance (the Ordinance) improperly restricted a permitted use in the Agricultural Zoning District without substantial relation to the health, safety and welfare of the community.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

In Keener v. Rapho Tp. Zoning Hearing Bd., No. 2306 C.D. 2012, July 31, 2013, the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court held that Rapho Township's Zoning Ordinance (the Ordinance) improperly restricted a permitted use in the Agricultural Zoning District without substantial relation to the health, safety and welfare of the community.  Consequently, the Court remanded the case to the Rapho Township Zoning Hearing Board (the ZHB) to reconsider the appellant's application for special exception.  

Factual Background  

James C. Keener (Keener) owned a 130-acre parcel situated in the Agricultural Zoning District which was primarily used as an active farm.  Keener submitted a special exception application (the Application), to use the existing structures on the property, including an 18th Century Bank Barn and a farmhouse, as a banquet hall, as well as to use the property as a whole for farm tours and guided walking and riding tours, among other things (the Proposed Use).  In

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from