Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JULY 2013

Kelo Property Still Vacant

Fox Rothschild LLP
Fox Rothschild LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Fox Rothschild LLP

In 2005, the US Supreme Court issued one of its most controversial decisions in Kelo v. City of New London.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

In 2005, the US Supreme Court issued one of its most controversial decisions. In Kelo v. City of New London, the Court held that it was not unconstitutional to use the power of eminent domain to take homes and other private property and transfer the property to private entities for economic development. It found that economic development was a "public purpose" which, therefore, satisfied the Fifth Amendment "public use" requirement.

Although the taking was held to be constitutional, the extraordinary public reaction caused the City of New London to abandon the project. 8 years later, the property remains vacant. Last year, New London Mayor Daryl Justin Finizio issued an apology to former Fort Trumbull property owners and announced a restructuring of the New London Development Corp. The NLDC was renamed the Renaissance City Development Association, and earlier this month, the leadership of the board changed. Linda Mariani, a lifelong resident of the city and an

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from