Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 OCTOBER 2016

District Court Refuses To Bind Surety To Subcontract Arbitration Clause

An engineering company was hired to perform work in connection with construction and renovation of the South African Embassy, and subcontracted for sheet metal work with a third party.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

An engineering company was hired to perform work in connection with construction and renovation of the South African Embassy, and subcontracted for sheet metal work with a third party. The subcontract contained an arbitration provision covering "any controversy or claim of Contractor against Subcontractor or Subcontractor against Contractor." The third party then negotiated with a surety company for a surety bond, which incorporated the subcontract by reference. After a dispute between the engineering company and its subcontractor arose, the engineering company terminated the subcontract, notified the surety company that it intended to make a claim under the surety bond, and filed a request to join the surety company as a party in arbitration proceedings with its subcontractor. The surety company refused to consent to joinder and both parties moved for summary judgment on the issue of whether they must arbitrate the dispute over the bond. The engineering company argued

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from