Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MARCH 2016

Aesthetics And Land Use Regulations

The Court of Appeals held that the property owner failed to prove her standing to appeal the commission's decision.

United StatesReal Estate and Construction

Perhaps disappointing to those who enjoy debating architecture, the North Carolina Court of Appeals affirmed dismissal of a challenge to a historic district commission's approval of a house located across the street from the contesting property owner's home. Cherry v. Wiesner __ N.C. App. __, __ S.E. 2d ___(WL 611074)(February 16, 2016). The Court of Appeals held that the property owner failed to prove her standing to appeal the commission's decision.

A fair reading of the Court of Appeals' opinion is that the property owner failed to produce sufficient evidence to prove standing at the right time, but a broader understanding of the case shows that the relationship between land use regulations and aesthetics is complex, uncertain and evolving.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from