Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 APRIL 2024

Waters No Less Rocky After Landmark BIPA Settlement

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

A year and a half has passed since one of the most remarkable jury verdicts in Illinois history. The Rogers v. BNSF case was the first Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act ("BIPA")...

United StatesPrivacy

Waters No Less Rocky After Landmark BIPA Settlement

A year and a half has passed since one of the most remarkable jury verdicts in Illinois history. The Rogers v. BNSF case was the first Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act ("BIPA") case tried to a jury verdict, with the jury finding BNSF liable for thousands of BIPA violations and federal Judge Matthew Kennelly awarding statutory damages of $228,000,000 to the class of plaintiffs. In our prior publication about the Rogers verdict, we noted that the case was tried before the Illinois Supreme Court decided the Tims v. Black Horse Carriers and the Cothron v. White Castle System Inc. cases.

As we discussed, the Tims and Cothron decisions made BIPA an unwieldly monster for Illinois employees. The Illinois Supreme Court in Tims held that a 5 year statute of limitations applies to BIPA claims and, in Cothron, the court held that a BIPA violation accrues with each unauthorized use of a biometric device. BIPA

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from