Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JUNE 2014

Plaintiffs Seek Expansion Of Video Privacy Laws

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Plaintiffs traditionally face an uphill battle in class actions alleging misuse of personally identifiable information (PII) gathered from Internet cookie tracking (i.e., data transferred between users’ web browsers and companies’ web sites).

United StatesPrivacy

Keywords: personally identifiable information, PII, cookie tracing, video privacy protection, VPPA

Plaintiffs traditionally face an uphill battle in class actions alleging misuse of personally identifiable information (PII) gathered from Internet cookie tracking (i.e., data transferred between users' web browsers and companies' web sites). Courts often take the view that plaintiffs lack cognizable injury—and thus standing—as browsing history and demographic information have little to no intrinsic value.1 However, the plaintiff's bar is ever on the lookout for new PII hooks, and recent efforts have centered on the Video Privacy Protection Act, 18 USC § 2710 (VPPA).

Congress enacted the VPPA in 1988 after Judge Robert Bork's video rental history famously leaked during his candidacy for nomination to Supreme Court. The VPPA prohibits "video tape service providers" from knowingly disclosing PII, which includes any information that links a customer to particular

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from