Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2013

Intelligence Under Law - Judiciary Testimony

Steptoe LLP
Steptoe LLP
Contributor
Steptoe LLP

Steptoe LLP

Steptoe International (UK) LLP has built a strong reputation for providing top-quality regulatory,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Steptoe LLP

The statement of Stewart A. Baker at the Oversight Hearing on the Administration's use of FISA Authorities.

United StatesPrivacy

I will be testifying today to the full House Judiciary Committee about FISA, NSA and the Snowden flap. You can download my full prepared remarks here.

In short

  • I used this opportunity to muse on the resemblance between today and the waning Clinton era;
  • I discuss the (surprisingly short) history of viewing intelligence as a sphere for detailed law-making;
  • I then turn to the programs Edward Snowden made famous and the nut of my argument on section 215;
  • I discuss my feeling that there's less to the story than meets the eye on section 702;
  • I cast doubt on the wisdom of trying to regulate intelligence use of big data tools;
  • Wrapping up, I lay out one of the newer problems caused by even the limited transparency we've created in this field and remark on the Europeans' shocked, shocked discovery that there's gambling in the house;
  • And finally, I suggest some solutions to the hostage problem.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from