Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 SEPTEMBER 2010

Important Decision on Preservation Obligations & Spoliation Relating to ESI

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

On September 9, 2010, Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm of the District of Maryland issued an 89-page opinion addressing a motion for terminating and other sanctions arising out of the defendants’ intentional destruction of evidence that includes a detailed analysis of the current state of the law relating to preservation and spoliation.

United StatesPrivacy

Originally published September 16, 2010

Keywords: ESI, destruction, evidence, preservation, spoliation, Victor Stanley, Creative Pipe, costs

On September 9, 2010, Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm of the District of Maryland issued an 89-page opinion addressing a motion for terminating and other sanctions arising out of the defendants' intentional destruction of evidence that includes a detailed analysis of the current state of the law relating to preservation and spoliation. The opinion may have important implications for litigants beleaguered by the escalating costs of implementing expansive preservation programs relating to electronically stored information (ESI) and concerned about potential spoliation claims.   

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from