Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MARCH 2023

Federal Wiretap Act: Illinois Court Rejects Claim Over Hospital Deploying Website Analytics Tools

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Contributor
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Manatt is a multidisciplinary, integrated national professional services firm known for quality and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP

Wiretapping claims have become the focus of the privacy plaintiff's bar, and the healthcare industry in particular has been in the crosshairs of recent filings (with as many as a couple dozen new purported class actions filed daily).

United StatesPrivacy

Wiretapping claims have become the focus of the privacy plaintiff's bar, and the healthcare industry in particular has been in the crosshairs of recent filings (with as many as a couple dozen new purported class actions filed daily). Wiretapping statutes have a long history in the privacy and cyber world, dating back to the 1960s in large part. Applying dated statutes and case law to modern technology frequently is challenging. And this is a recurring theme in the privacy litigation realm. While much of the hype is on new state privacy laws (such as the CCPA, Virginia's CPDA and Illinois's BIPA), the plaintiff's bar is opportunistic in repurposing old theories and claims applied to new technology. These statutes are supporting a feeding frenzy of lawsuit filings.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from