Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 NOVEMBER 2015

Challenging FTC Regulation Of Cyber-Security After FTC v. Wyndham

BakerHostetler
BakerHostetler
Contributor
BakerHostetler

BakerHostetler

Recognized as an innovator and one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler helps...

View firm profile
Explore more from BakerHostetler

The Third Circuit interlocutory decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Wyndham Worldwide Corporation was widely reported as a big win for the Federal Trade Commission.

United StatesPrivacy

The Third Circuit interlocutory decision in Federal Trade Commission v. Wyndham Worldwide Corporation was widely reported as a big win for the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC"). But on closer examination, it was a split decision in which Wyndham Worldwide Corporation ("Wyndham") can claim an important victory. While affirming the FTC's authority to regulate cyber-security practices under the "unfair practices" prong of the Federal Trade Commission Act (the "FTC Act"), the Third Circuit also rejected the FTC's contention that FTC settlements and consent orders in cyber-security cases with unrelated parties have created standards against which Wyndham's practices can be tested for "unfairness." This Third Circuit decision identifies defenses companies should develop when facing FTC allegations that the company's cyber-security practices are "unfair."1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from