Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 FEBRUARY 2015

California May Limit Law Enforcement’s Warrantless Data Collection

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Contributor
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz is a litigation powerhouse and business accelerator serving leaders in life sciences, private...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

The measure is backed by a long list of well-known companies and organizations, including Google, Apple, Facebook, Adobe, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Twitter, Foursquare the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the ACLU.

United StatesPrivacy

Eager to retain its spot among the principal laboratories for domestic privacy legislation, California's legislature is set to debate Senate Bill 178, legislation restricting state law enforcement agencies from requesting data without a warrant. Five other states have adopted similar legislation in recent months, and California's proposal largely follows that trend.

Broad Definitions Cover Most Electronic Communication Service Providers

SB 178, known as the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (or CalECPA, for short), curtails California's law enforcement agencies ability to compel companies providing "electronic communications services" from producing "electronic communication information" without a warrant, a wiretap order, or a showing of exigent circumstances. It also limits law enforcements' ability to conduct warrantless searches of mobile devices.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from