Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MARCH 2016

Anthem Decision Offers Answers, Raises Questions

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

In an 82-page decision issued on February 14, 2016, Northern District of California Judge Lucy Koh granted-in-part and denied-in-part motions to dismiss filed by Anthem, Inc.,

United StatesPrivacy

In an 82-page decision issued on February 14, 2016, Northern District of California Judge Lucy Koh granted-in-part and denied-in-part motions to dismiss filed by Anthem, Inc., and other health insurer defendants in response to a putative class action brought in the wake of Anthem's announcement that it had been the target of a criminal cyberattack. Plaintiffs asserted a variety of common law and statutory claims against Anthem, including claims under California's Unfair Competition Law ("UCL") and New York's General Business Law ("GBL"). Importantly, Judge Koh held that Plaintiffs have standing to proceed under Article III and California law and had met the requisite showing of "actual harm" under New York state law.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from