Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 DECEMBER 2013

Two Circuits Address The First Amendment Status Of Facebook Activity

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

Two recent U.S. appellate court decisions have clarified the extent to which the First Amendment protects the social media activities of government employees.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Two recent U.S. appellate court decisions have clarified the extent to which the First Amendment protects the social media activities of government employees.  In Gresham v. City of Atlanta, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that an individual's First Amendment interest in posting to Facebook is reduced when he or she configures such post to be private, while in Bland v. Roberts, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that Facebook "likes" constitute protected speech under the First Amendment.  Although both decisions deal with the rights of government employees in particular, the decisions have relevance beyond government employees.

U.S. courts have long held that the government has a greater interest in restricting the speech of its employees than it does in restricting the speech of the citizenry in general.  However, the government's ability to restrict the speech of its employees is limited by a test the U.S. Supreme Court outlined

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from