Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2025

TCPA Tracker: April-June 2025

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

On June 20, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a district court in an enforcement proceeding is not bound by an agency's pre-enforcement interpretation of a statute.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

I. SCOTUS Overturns Ninth Circuit's Precedent on Binding FCC Interpretations of the TCPA

On June 20, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a district court in an enforcement proceeding is not bound by an agency's pre-enforcement interpretation of a statute. Rather, as the Court held in McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation, the district court must independently interpret the statute according to traditional principles of statutory construction.

In 2009 and 2010, McKesson Corporation sent unsolicited fax advertisements to various medical practices, including McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc., in an effort to promote its products. In 2014, McLaughlin brought suit in the Northern District of California alleging that McKesson violated the TCPA by faxing unsolicited advertisements without the opt-out notice required under the statute. McLaughlin moved to certify a class of fax recipients who received the advertisements either on

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from