Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 DECEMBER 2024

Prerecorded Voice Claims Must Be Factually Supported

On November 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California issued a noteworthy decision highlighting the importance of carefully contesting a plaintiff's prerecorded voice claims.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

On November 26, 2024, the United States District Court for the Southern District of California issued a noteworthy decision highlighting the importance of carefully contesting a plaintiff's prerecorded voice claims. In Davis v. Rockloans Marketplace, LLC, the Court granted Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, in part,finding that Defendant had not placed prerecorded voice calls to Plaintiff in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act("TCPA"). As our readers are aware, the TCPA makes it unlawful "to initiate any telephone call to any residential telephone line using an artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message without the prior express consent of the called party."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from