Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 OCTOBER 2014

Negative Options: FTC Alleges ROSCA Violations For First Time

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC
Contributor
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Founded more than 40 years ago as a boutique law firm servicing the entertainment and arts...

View firm profile
Explore more from Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz PC

Remember ROSCA? That's OK, the FTC just remembered it too. It's the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act and it was enacted about four years ago.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Remember ROSCA?  That's OK, the FTC just remembered it too.

It's the Restore Online Shoppers' Confidence Act and it was enacted about four years ago with a primary goal of ensuring clear and conspicuous disclosure of the terms and conditions of online "negative option" offers.

"Negative option" plans allow companies to ship goods and services to a consumer on an ongoing basis until she cancels her plan. Until she cancels, the consumer is deemed to have consented to the new goods and services - and the charges for them. Although such plans can be very convenient for consumers, they can also be problematic if consumers expected to sign up for a single order rather than a continuing order that self-renews. ROSCA was intended to address this problem by requiring marketers to get unambiguous consent for the "negative option" feature of their sales.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from