Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2018

Communications Decency Act Protects Website Operators From Liability Despite Blogger Content Policy

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Explore more from Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

The Plaintiffs attempted to convince the SEO company to remove the post, but to no avail. It then turned its attention to Google.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

In affirming the grant of Google's Motion to Dismiss for failing to remove a blog post, on February 23, 2018, the D.C. Circuit Court concluded that the Communications Decency Act (CDA) immunizes website operators from liability for publication of third-party content even when they have content guidelines.

Background
In Bennett v. Google LLC, Case No. 17-cv-7106 (D.C. Cir. Feb. 23, 2018), the D.C. Circuit Court was presented with an appeal of a dismissal of Google, which was sued for failing to remove a blog post that was alleged to be defamatory to Dawn Bennett, owner of DJ Bennett Holdings, LLC (together, the Plaintiffs), a high-end sports apparel retailer.

In March 2013, the Plaintiffs hired a search engine optimization (SEO) and search engine marketing (SEM) company to provide services to help increase its sales. After a few months, the relationship soured and the Plaintiffs and the SEO company renegotiated their contract. An issue arose regarding payment, which

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from