Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MAY 2017

Advertising Litigation Report: Vol. 2, No. 2s

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP
Contributor
Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

We have one of the largest Southeast Asia international law practices, working across the region...

View firm profile
Explore more from Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP

District Court Adopts Report and Recommendation, Denies Judgment on the Pleadings, in Lanham Act Suit Challenging 'Same Quality' Claim.

United StatesMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

In this issue:

Lanham Act False Advertising

  • Summary Judgment Affirmed for Defendant in Lanham Act Challenge to Statements Concerning Popularity of Advertiser's Product, Scarcity of Challenger's Product
  • District Court Adopts Report and Recommendation, Denies Judgment on the Pleadings, in Lanham Act Suit Challenging 'Same Quality' Claim
  • Reputational Injury Arising From Unauthorized Use of Likeness May Support Lanham Act Liability
  • Court Rejects Lanham Act Claim Premised on Future Advertising by Nonparties

Consumer Fraud Class Action

  • House Passes Fairness in Class Action Litigation Act of 2017 H.R.985 — 115th Congress
  • Ninth Circuit: Plaintiffs Need Not Prove Administratively Feasible Method of Identifying Class Members to Establish Ascertainability

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from