Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 AUGUST 2021

U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. Catalent

MCWG client wins declaratory judgment in a $10 million lawsuit OVER coverage for Extortion Property Damage. U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. Catalent, Inc., No. 16cv4414 (DLC)...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Emilie Bakal-Caplan
Emilie Bakal-Caplan
Sara Lilling
Sara Lilling

MCWG Decisions, 2017

MCWG client wins declaratory judgment in a $10 million lawsuit OVER coverage for Extortion Property Damage.
U.S. Specialty Ins. Co. v. Catalent, Inc., No. 16cv4414 (DLC)

The insured sought coverage for business interruption losses in excess of $10 million allegedly sustained during a five-month government-mandated shutdown of its manufacturing operations after the discovery of "out-of-place" softgel capsules in several product batches at the insured's manufacturing facility.  The insured sought coverage for "Extortion Property Damage" under a Special Coverages Policy under the theory that the incidents must have been the result of malicious acts.  There was no evidence, however, that the insured received a "threat, communicated directly or indirectly . . .to cause physical damage or loss to PROPERTY," or a written or oral demand for money (i.e. a ransom) related to the misplaced softgel capsules.  The insurer denied coverage on the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from