Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 SEPTEMBER 2018

Underlying Assertion Of Negligent Misrepresentation Is Not Necessarily An Occurrence

Courts sometimes struggle with the issue of whether property damage arising in the context of a contractual relationship, particularly in construction contracts ...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Courts sometimes struggle with the issue of whether property damage arising in the context of a contractual relationship, particularly in construction contracts, constitutes an "occurrence" under a standard commercial general liability (CGL) policy. Generally, but not always – and it varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction – courts regard contractual breaches as non-accidental conduct, and/or apply the so-called "business risk" exclusions (such as the standard CGL "Your Work" exclusion), in finding no coverage. Lexington Ins. Co. v. Chicago Flameproof Wood Specialties Corp., No. 17-cv-3513 (N.D. Ill. Aug 10, 2018), a recent decision from a federal court in Illinois, is illustrative.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from