Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2022

This Week At The Ninth: Public Fora And Pretrial Disclosures

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

This week, the Court wrestles with a thorny First Amendment question that has divided other Courts of Appeals and considers district courts' ability to impose sanctions under Rule 37(c)(1).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

This week, the Court wrestles with a thorny First Amendment question that has divided other Courts of Appeals and considers district courts' ability to impose sanctions under Rule 37(c)(1).

GARNIER v. O'CONNOR-RATCLIFF

The Court holds that two local officials' blocking of particular constituents' comments on the officials' social media pages violated the First Amendment.

The panel: Judges Berzon, Tallman, and Friedland, with Judge Berzon writing the opinion.

Key highlight: "As this case demonstrates, analogies between physical public fora and the virtual public fora of the present are sometimes imperfect, and courts applying First Amendment protections to virtual spaces must be mindful of the nuances of how those online fora function in practice. Whatever those nuances, we have little doubt that social media will continue to play an essential role in hosting public debate and facilitating the free expression that lies at the heart of the First

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See more popular content from