Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 AUGUST 2018

The Ninth Circuit's Inadvertent Case For Imposing Daubert At Class Certification

Akin
Akin
Contributor
Akin

Akin

Akin is a global law firm with more than 1,100 lawyers and advisors who pride themselves on...

View firm profile
Explore more from Akin

Defense challenges to plaintiffs' expert witnesses under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm. Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), are an important tool for defeating class certification,

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Defense challenges to plaintiffs' expert witnesses under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm. Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), are an important tool for defeating class certification, but some courts are reluctant to perform a full Daubert analysis at the class certification stage. See, e.g., In re Zurn Pex Plumbing Prod. Liab. Litig., 644 F.3d 604, 612-13 (8th Cir. 2011) (adopting a more lenient ''focused Daubert'' inquiry at the class certification stage because ''a court's inquiry on a motion for class certification is tentative, preliminary, and limited'') (internal quotation marks omitted); Beltran v. InterExchange Inc., No. 1:14-cv-03074, 2018 BL 108181 (D. Colo. March 27, 2018) (same); In re Scotts EZ Seed Litig., 304 F.R.D. 397, 412 n.8 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) (analyzing ''whether each of [the expert's] proposed methodologies satisfy Comcast'' rather than conducting a full Daubert analysis).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from