Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2017

The Ninth Circuit's Food Court Menu: A Status Update

Morrison Foerster
Morrison Foerster
Contributor
Morrison Foerster

Morrison Foerster

With approximately 1,000 lawyers in 19 offices, Morrison & Foerster is a preeminent global law firm...

View firm profile
Explore more from Morrison Foerster

A few years back, the Northern District of California was dubbed the "food court" based on the influx of food misbranding class actions claiming that alleged FDA regulatory infractions constituted violations...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A few years back, the Northern District of California was dubbed the "food court" based on the influx of food misbranding class actions claiming that alleged FDA regulatory infractions constituted violations of California consumer deception statutes.  The first cases in the misbranding pack were appealed to the Ninth Circuit, with plaintiffs challenging district courts' denials of class certification and grants of summary judgment in favor of defendants, while the matters filed later were stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's guidance on these class certification and summary judgment issues.  Now, the Ninth Circuit has weighed in on a few of the pending misbranding appeals.  But its decisions thus far raise more questions rather than provide clear answers.  Below, we review the status of key Ninth Circuit misbranding appeals as well as the impact of these decisions on class certification and summary judgment standards going forward.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from