Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 NOVEMBER 2015

The Future Of Mandatory Consumer Arbitration Clauses

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Arbitration as a means of dispute resolution is intended to help consumers and businesses save time and money and achieve fair results when compared to traditional litigation.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Arbitration as a means of dispute resolution is intended to help consumers and businesses save time and money and achieve fair results when compared to traditional litigation. Millions of contracts for consumer financial products and services have a pre-dispute arbitration clause ("arbitration clause") that requires consumers and financial institutions to resolve their disputes through arbitration, rather than through the court system.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act") required the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ("CFPB" or "Bureau") to study arbitration agreements and submit its findings in a report to Congress ("CFPB Study").1 In sharp contrast to the intent of arbitration clauses, the CFPB Study, released in March 2015, concluded that the overwhelming majority of consumers are unaware whether their financial products and services contracts require resolution of disputes through arbitration or through

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from