Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MAY 2012

The District Judge Continues To Play Bingo

What a sexy claim!! Cry baby gamblers of bingo in ‘Bama.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Adams v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc., No. 3:11-CV-125-WKW [WO], 2011 WL 5294732 (M.D. Ala. Nov. 3, 2011).

What a sexy claim!! Cry baby gamblers of bingo in 'Bama.  After being bright enough to lose their money playing electronic bingo (WTF? Electronic Bingo?? You can almost hear the mechanical voice holler B19, B19) they sue to get their lost money back asserting it is illegal to gamble. 

Ultimately, the federal court refused to remand the case to the state court finding that the CAFA exceptions were inapplicable to the plaintiffs' claims.

The plaintiffs in this case, 816 people who spent millions of dollars playing electronic bingo machines, brought a single claim under § 8-1-150 of the Alabama Code seeking to recover money that they lost playing electronic bingo machines at Victoryland and Quincy's 777. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from