Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 FEBRUARY 2026

The Defendant Strikes Back: A Strategy For Managing Nationwide Class Action Risk

Arnold & Porter
Arnold & Porter
Contributor
Arnold & Porter

Arnold & Porter

With over 1,000 lawyers across 16 offices worldwide, Arnold & Porter is renowned for its...

View firm profile
Explore more from Arnold & Porter

Class actions create significant risk for defendants through nationwide exposure and settlement pressure. However, defendants can leverage early procedural motions to strike nationwide class allegations at the pleading stage, potentially narrowing exposure before costly discovery begins. This strategy allows defendants to challenge improper nationwide class claims when choice-of-law conflicts and state law variations make certification facially untenable.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Class actions are designed to aggregate claims and create efficiencies, but for defendants, they often present sprawling risk, potentially nationwide exposure, and create immense settlement pressure long before the merits are even tested. In recent years, defendants have increasingly turned to an early procedural weapon to limit exposure: the motion to strike nationwide class allegations. By challenging national class claims at the pleading stage, defendants can narrow or even eliminate class allegations and reduce their overall litigation exposure before costly discovery begins. Although the viability of these motions can differ widely depending on the judge and jurisdiction, the governing rules give courts the authority to dismiss deficient class allegations early when they are facially untenable.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from