Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2021

Surprising New Pro-Employer PAGA Decision

Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard
Explore more from Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard

Applying these principles to the factual record before the trial court, the Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's order striking plaintiff's PAGA claim.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Issue

In Wesson v. Staples the Office Superstore, LLC, (Cal. Ct. App., Sept. 9, 2021, No. B302988) 2021 WL 4099059, Division Four of the Second Appellate District of the California Court of Appeal tackled an issue of first impression: "whether trial courts have inherent authority to ensure that PAGA claims will be manageable at trial, and to strike such claims if they cannot be managed." (Id. at *1.)

Result

After drawing on established principles of the courts' inherent authority to manage litigation, including ensuring the manageability of representative claims, the Court of Appeal concluded that "courts have inherent authority to ensure that PAGA claims can be fairly and efficiently tried and, if necessary, may strike claims that cannot be rendered manageable" and "as a matter of due process, defendants are entitled to a fair opportunity to litigate available affirmative defenses, and a court's manageability assessment should account for them..." (Id. at

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from