Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2025

Supreme Court Traps Itself In Muddy First Amendment Standards

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Contributor
Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

About Kelley Drye We’re focused—in key areas of the law and on the nuances of each matter—to help...

View firm profile
Explore more from Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

The US Supreme Court's decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton denying a First Amendment challenge to a Texas law requiring online publishers of sexual content to verify the ages...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The US Supreme Court's decision in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton denying a First Amendment challenge to a Texas law requiring online publishers of sexual content to verify the ages of Texas users likely represents a narrow holding applicable only to obscene content. But the court's analysis raises broader questions that bear on the constitutionality of other age verification provisions.

The Texas law at the center of the case requires operators of websites, at least onethird of whose content is “sexual material harmful to minors,” to verify that every Texas user is older than 18. Texas asserted the law holds website operators to the same standard as brick-and-mortar institutions, which must check identification to sell explicit content.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from