Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 OCTOBER 2004

Supreme Court Docket Report - October Term, 2004 – Number 1

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution specifies that "private property [shall not] be taken for public use without just compensation." It is well established that the states may exercise their eminent domain power for urban renewal and blight removal.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published September 28, 2004

Recently the Supreme Court granted certiorari in three cases of interest to the business community. Amicus briefs in support of petitioners will be due on Friday, November 12, 2004, and amicus briefs in support of respondents will be due on Friday, December 17, 2004.

1. Takings Clause — Requirement of "Public Use".

The Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution specifies that "private property [shall not] be taken for public use without just compensation." It is well established that the states may exercise their eminent domain power for urban renewal and blight removal. See Berman v. Parker, 348 U.S. 26 (1954); Hawaii Housing Auth. v. Midkiff, 467 U.S. 229 (1984). The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Kelo v. City of New London, No. 04-108, to clarify the scope of the "public use" requirement, and in particular to decide whether a state’s use of the eminent domain power for economic development that falls short

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from