Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JUNE 2009

Supreme Court Docket Report - June 15, 2009

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The Supreme Court today granted certiorari in" Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds International Corp.", No. 08-1198, to decide whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) authorizes the use of class arbitration proceedings when the parties’ arbitration agreement does not expressly permit class arbitration.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published June 15, 2009

Keywords: Federal Arbitration Act, FAA, class arbitration, Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds International Corp, Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle, Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Company, constructive termination, constructive nonrenewal claims, Marcoux v. Shell Oil Products Co, Hamilton v. Lanning

On June 15, 2009, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in two cases of interest to the business community:

Federal Arbitration Act—Class Arbitration

The Supreme Court today granted certiorari in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds International Corp., No. 08-1198, to decide whether the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) authorizes the use of class arbitration proceedings when the parties' arbitration agreement does not expressly permit class arbitration—an issue that was presented in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle, 539 U.S. 444 (2003), but ultimately not decided when that case

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from