Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 MARCH 2009

Supreme Court Docket Report - Decision Alert - March 4, 2008

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., a manufacturer must receive the approval of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before marketing a new drug. See 21 U.S.C. § 355(b).

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published March 4, 2009

Keywords: Wyeth, Food and Drug Administration, FDA, FDCA, federal preemption, drug labeling, failure to warn

Today the Supreme Court issued a decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Wyeth v. Levine, No. 06-1249 (previously discussed in the January 21, 2008 Docket Report).

Under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), 21 U.S.C. § 301 et seq., a manufacturer must receive the approval of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before marketing a new drug. See 21 U.S.C. § 355(b). The FDA exercises continuing regulatory authority over approved drugs, and it normally must pre-approve any change in drug labeling. See 21 C.F.R. § 314.70. In order to resolve a dispute among the lower courts regarding the preemptive effect of FDA approval, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Wyeth v. Levine, No. 06-1249, to determine "whether FDA drug labeling judgments preempt state-law product liability claims

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from