Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2016

Supreme Court Declines Review Of "Ascertainability" Issues

On February 29, the Supreme Court denied certiorari review in Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLC, No. 15-1776.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On February 29, the Supreme Court denied certiorari review in Mullins v. Direct Digital, LLC, No. 15-1776.  The Mullins decision, which arose out of the Seventh Circuit, created a circuit split with the Eleventh and Third circuits with respect to the implicit "ascertainability" requirement that those two circuits had found precluded class certification.  In Mullins, the Seventh Circuit held that a class plaintiff is not required to demonstrate the "administrative feasibility" of ascertaining a class.  Rather, a plaintiff must only demonstrate that the class definition is "defined clearly and based on objective criteria." 

The "implicit" element of ascertainability has recently gained traction at the district court level as a major obstacle to class certification in certain cases.  The requirement is generally viewed as mandating that class membership be, in practice, objectively ascertainable and not require the extensive use of "mini-trials" to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from