Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 MAY 2013

Supreme Court Decision Alert - May 20, 2013

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Under Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. S. 837 (1984), courts must defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous provision in a statute that the agency is charged with administering.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Keywords: Chevron, telecommunications act, FCC,

Today the Supreme Court issued two decisions, described below, of interest to the business community.

Chevron Deference to Agencies' Jurisdictional Determinations—Telecommunications Act

City of Arlington v. FCC, No. 11-1545 (previously discussed in the October 8, 2012, Docket Report)

Under Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U. S. 837 (1984), courts must defer to an agency's reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous provision in a statute that the agency is charged with administering. Today, a majority of the Supreme Court ruled that Chevron deference extends to an agency's interpretation that concerns the scope of the agency's jurisdiction.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from