Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2015

Supreme Court Decision Alert - March 31, 2015

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Medicaid—Private Right of Action—Supremacy Clause

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Today, the Supreme Court issued one decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Medicaid—Private Right of Action—Supremacy Clause

Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc., No. 14-15 (previously described in the October 2, 2014, Docket Report)

Section 30(A) of the Medicaid Act requires that state Medicaid plans contain procedures to ensure that reimbursement rates for healthcare providers "are consistent with efficiency, economy, and quality of care and are sufficient to enlist enough providers" to meet the need for care and services in the geographic area. 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a)(30)(A). The statute does not include an express right of action for Medicaid providers to challenge a state plan for failure to comply with Section 30(A). Today, in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center, Inc., No. 14-15, the Supreme Court held that the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution does not confer an implied private right of action allowing providers

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from