Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2009

Supreme Court Decision Alert - June 29, 2009

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

In a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Scalia, the Supreme Court held today that the National Bank Act (“NBA”), 12 U.S.C. § 484(a), does not prohibit states from enforcing generally applicable state laws against national banks, but does prohibit states from issuing investigative subpoenas to such banks.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Originally published June 29, 2009

Keywords: Cuomo, Clearing House Association, National Bank Act, NBA, home mortgage, fair-lending laws, lending practices, OCC, OCC regulation

Today the Supreme Court issued a decision, described below, of interest to the business community.

Cuomo v. Clearing House Association, L.L.C., No. 08-453 (previously discussed in the January 16, 2009 Docket Report)

In a 5-4 decision authored by Justice Scalia, the Supreme Court held today that the National Bank Act ("NBA"), 12 U.S.C. § 484(a), does not prohibit states from enforcing generally applicable state laws against national banks, but does prohibit states from issuing investigative subpoenas to such banks. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from