Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 FEBRUARY 2013

Supreme Court Decision Alert - February 19, 2013

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

Under the "state-action immunity" doctrine, when a local governmental entity acts pursuant to a clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed state policy to displace competition, it is exempt from scrutiny under the federal antitrust laws.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Keywords: antitrust, state-action doctrine, competition, special-purpose public entities

Antitrust—State-Action Doctrine

Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., No. 11-1160

Under the "state-action immunity" doctrine, when a local governmental entity acts pursuant to a clearly articulated and affirmatively expressed state policy to displace competition, it is exempt from scrutiny under the federal antitrust laws. Today, in a unanimous decision authored by Justice Sotomayor, the Supreme Court held that a Georgia law that creates special-purpose public entities called hospital authorities and gives those entities general corporate powers does not include authorization to use those powers anticompetitively. Because the Court's decision clarifies the elements necessary for the state-action doctrine to apply and the scope of the doctrine's applicability, it is of interest to businesses (including hospitals) that are subject to supervision by

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from