Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 FEBRUARY 2014

Stipulated Dismissals And Appeals Of Class Actions

When the Rules Committee amended Rule 23 in 1998 to allow for interlocutory appeals, it made them discretionary.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

 When the Rules Committee amended Rule 23 in 1998 to allow for interlocutory appeals, it made them discretionary. The result, as I've written before, is that class action litigators have had to make these appeals attractive to appellate courts in much the same way that appellate litigators must prepare certiorari petitions. 

But, as it turns out, there is one way for plaintiffs at least to ensure that an appellate court hears a denial of certification.

In Berger v. Home Depot USA, Inc., No. 11-55592, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2059 (9th Cir. Feb. 3, 2014), the plaintiff had filed a class action against Home Depot, alleging that it automatically imposed a surcharge on tool rentals for an optional damage waiver. The district court denied certification, leaving only the individual case. Rather than prosecute or settle the named plaintiff's individual claims, his counsel stipulated to the dismissal of the claim, and then appealed the dismissal. The tactic worked. As the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from