Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 FEBRUARY 2023

Should Default Interest Be Included In A New York Criminal Usury Analysis

The New York Court of Appeals has been busy redressing lower state and federal courts' interpretations of its usury laws for the past two years.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The New York Court of Appeals has been busy redressing lower state and federal courts' interpretations of its usury laws for the past two years. Two Circuit Courts of Appeals—the 9th Circuit and the 2nd Circuit—have certified questions to New York's highest court on certain unsettled usury issues. See Adar Bays, LLC v. GeneSYS ID, Inc., 962 F.3d 86 (2d Cir. 2020); Fast Trak Inv. Co., LLC v. Sax, 962 F.3d 455 (9th Cir. 2020). The latter case was dismissed upon settlement of those issues. Our Adar Bays case resulted in a convincing win on other usury issues.

Another unsettled issue of law that may make its way to the New York Court of Appeals is contractual default interest and default charges built into financial transactions, and whether default rates and charges should apply to interest subject to New York's criminal usury analysis. There is a split of authority stretching over both federal and state courts on this issue that has not been addressed, nor resolved by

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from