Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MAY 2026

Seventh Circuit Weighs In On Critical BIPA Retroactivity Question

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

The Seventh Circuit's recent ruling on Illinois's Biometric Information Privacy Act has fundamentally altered the damages landscape for hundreds of pending class actions. By determining that the 2024 amendment limiting recovery to one penalty per person applies retroactively, the court reversed multiple district court decisions and significantly reduced potential exposure for companies facing BIPA litigation.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Since its enactment in 2008, Illinois’s Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”) has been recognized as a pioneering law in biometric privacy, imposing strict requirements on private entities that collect or use biometric identifiers such as fingerprints, facial geometry, and voiceprints. Its unique combination of a private right of action, statutory damages, and no requirement to prove actual harm has made it a powerful tool for plaintiffs and a persistent source of exposure for companies.

Following the first legislative amendment to the statute in 2024, courts and litigants faced critical questions about the scope of liability and the retroactive application of new rules, and in the years that have followed there have been split opinions at the state and district court levels. Last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the 2024 amendment, which limited statutory damages to a single recovery per person, applies retroactively to cases that were already

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from