Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MAY 2020

Seventh Circuit Finds Article III Standing For An Illinois BIPA Claim

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

On May 5, 2020, the Seventh Circuit held that allegations that a defendant violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act ("BIPA") by collecting a biometric information without first obtaining informed consent...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On May 5, 2020, the Seventh Circuit held that allegations that a defendant violated the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act ("BIPA") by collecting a biometric information without first obtaining informed consent constituted an "injury in fact" sufficient to confer Article III standing. Bryant v. Compass Group USA, Inc., No. 20-1443. Prior to this ruling, a majority of federal district courts in Illinois had come to the opposite conclusion, resulting in employers having to litigate BIPA putative class actions in Illinois state court, which has more lenient standing requirements. (We have blogged about BIPA-related standing issues here and here.)

Background

Plaintiff worked for a call center in Illinois which had a workplace cafeteria with vending machines operated by the Compass Group ("Compass"). The machines did not accept cash; rather, employees had to scan and use their fingerprints to create user accounts and to purchase items.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from