Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 OCTOBER 2015

Revised Rule 23 Proposals Show Some Promise

The Rule 23 amendment process has continued apace.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Rule 23 amendment process has continued apace. For those of you who did not read Paul Karlsgodt's excellent summary of the September 11 mini-conference (which included a number of class-action luminaries from both sides of the aisle), I'd recommend you head straight over to do so.

For the mini-conference, the Rule 23 Subcommittee published its latest thoughts on various topics(click on "Mini Conference Materials), and these are the latest versions of its proposals to debate.

In general, the proposals have improved significantly. It's clear that the Subcommittee is listening to reactions from all sides as part of its barnstorming tour. That doesn't mean that there's not further room for improvement, however. Without further ado, here are the latest area of debate, and my thoughts on each. [Disclosure: I assisted in the drafting of some language for both the DRI's and LCJ's responses. The following are my personal reactions.]

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from