Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JULY 2016

No Deference To State Settlements Under CERCLA? No Problem!

In a concise opinion, Judge Jorgenson ran through the established criteria used to establish procedural and substantive fairness and – properly – blessed the settlements.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

I will confess that I do enjoy being correct.  In 2014, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals refused to defer to a state agency determination of the procedural and substantive fairness of a CERCLA consent decree. Various parties and commentators promptly began, if I may say so, to run around like chickens with their heads cut off.  However, I remained calm.  I stated then:

I'm assuming that, on remand, the district court will engage in the required review and again approve the settlements.

On July 13, the District Court on remand did exactly that.  In a concise opinion, Judge Jorgenson ran through the established criteria used to establish procedural and substantive fairness and – properly – blessed the settlements.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from