Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2026

Nevada Supreme Court Overrules Caselaw On Post-Trial Contingency Fee Awards

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Explore more from Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP

This website uses cookies and similar technologies to enhance site functionality, analyze performance, and deliver personalized content and advertising experiences. Users maintain control over cookie preferences across different categories, with the ability to modify settings and review detailed information about data handling practices, third-party sharing arrangements, and individual privacy rights.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Nevada’s Supreme Court has overruled Capriati Construction Corp. v. Yahyavi, 137 Nev. 675, 498 P.3d 226 (2021) to the extent it holds that a plaintiff represented on a contingency fee may recover the entire contingency fee if an offer of judgment is beaten. In Clark v. Marin, 142 Nev. Adv. Op. 47 (July 2, 2026), Marin sued Clark for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle accident. Marin served Clark a $2 million offer of judgment 24 days before trial. The jury’s verdict totaled $2,045,117.55. Offers of judgment under NRCP 68 are a powerful tool, allowing a plaintiff to serve an offer of judgment and recover post-offer attorneys’ fees if the plaintiff recovers more than was offered. The verdict here, plus prejudgment interest and taxable costs, produced a judgment that exceeded $2 million, so the plaintiff moved for attorneys’ fees.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from