Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2023

Massachusetts Ballot Questions – Recent Decisions

WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Contributor
WilmerHale

WilmerHale

WilmerHale's London office was established more than 40 years ago. With lawyers qualified in the...

View firm profile
Explore more from WilmerHale

Senior Counsel Neal Quenzer contributed a Case Comment for the July 2023 issue of the Massachusetts Law Review, published by the Massachusetts Bar Association.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Senior Counsel Neal Quenzer contributed a Case Comment for the July 2023 issue of the Massachusetts Law Review, published by the Massachusetts Bar Association.

The Case Comment discusses four recent Massachusetts ballot questions, highlighting decisions of the Supreme Judicial Court that addressed whether the proposed questions satisfied the relatedness requirement of Article 48 of the Amendments to the Massachusetts Constitution. The relatedness requirement aims to ensure that each ballot question contains only "related subjects."

The cases covered in the Case Comment include:

  • Anderson v. Attorney General: A case concerning a proposed constitutional amendment to impose an income surtax on high earners for education and transportation funding. The relatedness requirement did not apply to this question since the amendment was initiated by the legislature. The court held that the attorney general's summary of the amendment was constitutionally sufficient to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from