Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 OCTOBER 2002

Manipulation Of A Product´s Inherent Nature May Create Claim Beyond Immunity Statue

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Author LinkedIn connections

Naegele v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

August 5, 2002, 28 Cal.4th 856

Plaintiff, Edwin Brigham smoked cigarettes from 1950 until 1996, when he was diagnosed with lung cancer. He sued defendants, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation seeking personal injury damages on theories of negligence, product liability, and fraud. Defendants demurred, citing an immunity statute as a bar to all of plaintiff's causes of action. The trial court sustained defendants' demurrer but granted plaintiff leave to amend the complaint.

When defendants thereafter demurred to plaintiff's first amended complaint, the trial court sustained the demurrer and dismissed plaintiff's lawsuit against defendants. On plaintiff's appeal, the Court of Appeal affirmed. Thereafter, the California Supreme Court granted plaintiff's petition for review.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from