Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2017

Made-in-the-U.S.A. Complaint Does Not Make the Cut

Proskauer Rose LLP
Proskauer Rose LLP
Contributor
Proskauer Rose LLP

Proskauer Rose LLP

Firm Overview Proskauer is an elite global law firm with more than 900 lawyers across key financial...

View firm profile
Explore more from Proskauer Rose LLP

Where the plaintiff either resorts to naked conclusions, or its factual allegations are too incomplete to be plausible, the complaint must be dismissed, as the court in the Citizens for Humanity case...

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a case decided in December that flew beneath our radar, a judge in the Southern District of California dismissed without prejudice a proposed class action alleging that Citizens for Humanity falsely labeled its jeans as being made in the USA. Hass v. Citizens of Humanity, LLC, 2016 WL 7097870 (S.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2016). This month, plaintiff notified the court that another amended complaint would not be filed, and the court has now dismissed the case with prejudice.  On the face of it, this case may not seem especially noteworthy, but the rationale for the court's decision is emblematic of what may be becoming a long-overdue trend.

Under California Business and Professions Code § 17533.7, it is unlawful to sell an article marked Made in the USA if the article has been "entirely or substantially made, manufactured, or produced outside of the United States."  Effective January 1, 2016, the statute contained a safe harbor for products in which foreign parts do not

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from